- Massive Battery, Minor Edge: A new torture test found the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (with a huge 7,500 mAh battery) lasted only 5 minutes longer than Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max, which has a roughly 4,823–5,088 mAh battery – a 36% smaller capacity[1][2]. After ~13.6 hours of heavy use, the Xiaomi phone shut down just moments after the iPhone, defying expectations that its battery would dominate[3].
- Xiaomi’s Feature Overdrive: Xiaomi’s new 17 series flagships are built to one-up Apple’s iPhone 17 lineup with sheer specs. The top-end 17 Pro Max packs a 6.9-inch 120 Hz AMOLED display plus a second screen on the back for notifications and selfies, a colossal 7,500 mAh silicon-carbon battery, and blazing-fast 100 W charging[4][5]. Despite the bigger battery, it’s surprisingly lighter (219 g vs over 230 g for the iPhone)[6], showcasing Xiaomi’s design efficiency.
- Apple’s Efficiency Upset: Tech experts say this near-tie in battery life comes down to Apple’s silicon and software efficiency. The iPhone 17 Pro Max’s A19 Pro chip and tight hardware-software integration in iOS 26 squeeze exceptional endurance out of a smaller power pack[7][8]. In other words, raw capacity isn’t everything – Apple’s optimizations let a ~5,000 mAh iPhone nearly match a 7,500 mAh Android flagship in real-world use.
- Price & Market Showdown: Xiaomi is aggressively undercutting Apple on price. The base Xiaomi 17 starts around $630 in China, taking direct aim at Apple’s much pricier iPhone 17 series[9]. Even the decked-out 17 Pro Max costs roughly ¥5,999 (~$820) in its home market[10], whereas Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max launches at about $999+ in the US (₹1.49 lakh in India for 256 GB)[11]. This value play is part of Xiaomi’s strategy to lure premium buyers away from Apple’s ecosystem with more bang for the buck.
Battery Life Showdown: 7,500 mAh vs Apple’s Efficiency
Consumers expected Xiaomi’s new 7,500 mAh battery beast to blow past Apple’s latest Pro Max – but a real-world drain test delivered a surprise. YouTuber TechDroider put the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max through a rigorous battery torture test alongside the iPhone 17 Pro Max, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, Google Pixel 10 Pro XL, last year’s Xiaomi 15 Pro, and OnePlus 13[12][13]. Each device looped through power-hungry tasks (hours of gaming, video streaming, web browsing, social media, and continuous 4K recording) until death[14]. The outcome: Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max lasted 13 hours 36 minutes, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max hit 13 hours 31 minutes[15]. Incredibly, Apple’s phone died only about 5 minutes earlier despite its battery being drastically smaller.
This negligible gap has stunned many tech watchers. “The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max doesn’t do justice to its large 7,500 mAh cell… [it] only lasted around 5 more minutes than the iPhone 17 Pro Max, a device with a 36% smaller battery,” one analysis noted, attributing Apple’s endurance to its super-efficient A19 Pro SoC and behind-the-scenes iOS optimizations[16]. In other words, Apple’s custom silicon and tight integration allow it to punch above its weight in battery life. The Xiaomi did outlast every other Android in the test (for example, Samsung’s Galaxy S25 Ultra gave up after ~11.3 hours)[17], yet the iPhone 17 Pro Max still nearly matched Xiaomi’s best-in-class runtime. As Gizmochina’s Debasish Sarkar pointed out, this dramatic result “suggests Apple has again done an incredible job with its tightly integrated hardware–software approach,” achieving top-tier efficiency[18].
It’s worth noting that Xiaomi’s advantage in raw battery capacity comes from adopting new Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) battery technology, which offers higher energy density. The 17 Pro Max is actually the first mainstream flagship to feature a 7,500 mAh Si/C cell[19], enabling that massive capacity without making the phone too bulky. Apple, for its part, finally crossed the 5,000 mAh threshold this year – the iPhone 17 Pro Max is the first iPhone to pack over 5,000 mAh (in its U.S. eSIM model)[20]. However, Apple’s gains came more from efficiency than sheer battery size. The nearly equal 13.5-hour endurance of these two phones drives home that battery optimization matters as much as battery size. It also reinforces that the iPhone 17 Pro Max remains “one of the top performers in battery endurance” among all phones[21].
Charging Speed is another battleground, and here Xiaomi leaves Apple in the dust. The 17 Pro Max supports 100 W ultra-fast wired charging (plus 50 W wireless), letting power users top-up in mere minutes[22]. Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max, by contrast, introduces 40 W wired charging – an improvement for Apple, but still far slower than Xiaomi’s solution[23]. In practice, Xiaomi owners can get a full day’s charge in well under an hour, whereas the iPhone still takes a bit longer to refill. Nonetheless, Apple’s focus on battery health may make it cautious about faster charging. The bottom line on battery: Xiaomi wins on spec sheet muscle, but Apple’s efficiency narrows the real-world gap to a sliver.
Design & Features: Xiaomi’s Bold Second Screen vs Apple’s Refined Build
Beyond battery stats, Xiaomi is flexing its design muscles to challenge Apple head-on. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and iPhone 17 Pro Max both offer expansive 6.9-inch displays on the front, but Xiaomi takes a radically different approach to the back of the phone. In place of a plain camera bump, Xiaomi has embedded a functional secondary display on the rear[24]. This rear AMOLED panel encircles the camera lenses and can display notifications, serve as a vlogging viewfinder, or even act as a touch shutter button for selfies[25]. It’s a bold, eye-catching feature that instantly sets the Xiaomi apart from the iPhone. Apple’s design, meanwhile, features a prominent camera “plateau” on the back – a raised island housing its three lenses in the familiar triangular layout[26]. While Apple’s bump is purely functional (making room for sensors and logic board), Xiaomi’s turns that space into usable screen real estate. This shows Xiaomi’s philosophy of leaving no surface unused in the quest to outdo the iPhone.
Build materials and finish also highlight differing strategies. Xiaomi uses an advanced Dragon Crystal Glass 3 on the Pro Max for extra durability, plus a sturdy aluminum frame and even a ceramic back on some editions[27]. It offers an IP68 water resistance rating up to 6 m depth for 30 minutes, matching Apple’s ingress protection[28]. Apple, for the 2025 Pro Max, reportedly returned to an aluminum frame (moving away from the stainless steel of past models) and employs Ceramic Shield 2 glass on front and back for toughness[29][30]. Both phones are premium glass-and-metal sandwiches, but Xiaomi pushes exotic touches like a titanium alloy frame (on the 17 Pro variant) and even a secondary rear screen on both Pro and Pro Max models[31][32]. Apple’s design language is more conservative – aside from the refined Dynamic Island cutout on the display (versus Xiaomi’s simple punch-hole camera), the iPhone 17 Pro Max looks evolutionarily similar to its predecessor, with a sleek but familiar silhouette.
One surprising feat is that the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, despite its larger battery and dual displays, manages to be thinner and lighter than the iPhone. Xiaomi’s flagship measures just 8.0 mm thick and weighs about 219 g, whereas Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max is around 8.8 mm and ~233 g in weight[33][34]. Xiaomi basically proves that even with a monster battery, careful engineering (using lighter materials and trimming fat) can keep the phone’s weight down. This is a notable achievement since large battery phones often tip the scales. As a result, the 17 Pro Max offers a big-screen, big-battery experience in a package that’s actually a bit easier on the pocket (and wrist) than Apple’s heaviest handset.
In terms of overall look and feel, Xiaomi’s aesthetic is flashy futurism – think curved glass, vibrant color options (Black, White, Purple, Green)[35][36], and that unique rear display that screams “tech gadget.” Apple’s style is more classic and minimal, with colorways like Silver, Deep Blue, and a new Cosmic Orange, and a familiar triple-camera stare. Both devices exude ultra-premium quality; which design is “better” comes down to personal taste. What’s clear is that Xiaomi has thrown down the gauntlet by reimagining the flagship smartphone format (secondary screens, extreme battery, etc.), while Apple is betting that its refined, cohesive design and brand identity will continue to win hearts.
It’s no coincidence Xiaomi named its 2025 lineup the “17” series, skipping the number 16 – a move widely seen as positioning it directly against Apple’s iPhone 17 generation[37]. From the naming to the features, Xiaomi is signaling that it wants to compete head-to-head with Apple’s best. As PhoneArena quipped, “secondary displays, 7,500 mAh batteries, and $630 starting price take direct aim at Apple’s flagship lineup.”[38] In short, Xiaomi is coming for the crown with an arsenal of hardware innovations and aggressive design choices.
Performance & Software: Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs A19 Pro
Under the hood, both flagship phones are powerhouses, but they take very different silicon paths. Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max runs on Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset[39] – an octa-core SoC that represents the cutting edge of Android performance in 2025. This chip, fabricated on a 3 nm process, delivers blazing speeds and advanced AI capabilities, and Xiaomi pairs it with up to 16 GB of RAM for heavy multitasking[40][41]. On the other side, Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max is powered by Apple’s custom A19 Pro chip, also built on a 3 nm node. Apple’s silicon is renowned for its high per-core performance and efficiency, and the A19 Pro continues that tradition with a six-core GPU and specialized neural engines[42]. Notably, this is the first iPhone series where Apple bumped the RAM to 12 GB (parity with Xiaomi on paper)[43], ensuring iOS can keep more apps active and handle big camera features like 8K video recording smoothly.
When it comes to raw benchmarks, both chips are among the fastest ever in smartphones. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 pushes Android performance into new territory (early tests show huge AnTuTu scores), while Apple’s A19 likely still holds an edge in certain tasks thanks to Apple’s tight vertical integration. However, direct comparisons are tricky. As reviewers note, “the power efficiency of the A19 Pro and Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 cannot be compared directly, as the devices run on different platforms and are optimized differently.”[44] iOS and Android handle tasks in distinct ways, and each chip is tuned for its own ecosystem. Apple’s advantage, as evidenced in the battery test, is how well its hardware and software work in harmony. The upside for Xiaomi is that Qualcomm’s chips often excel at graphics and AI computations that Android apps can leverage, and Xiaomi can tout support for technologies like Ray Tracing in games or advanced camera AI through its chipset’s capabilities (not to mention easier emulator support for consoles, etc., which enthusiasts care about).
On the software front, the two phones diverge completely. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max runs HyperOS 3, Xiaomi’s new operating system based on Android 16[45]. This is Xiaomi’s evolution of MIUI, blending Android’s flexibility with Xiaomi’s own AI features and customization. Users get a ton of options – from themeing the system to utilizing Xiaomi’s AI assistant and cross-device ecosystem (Xiaomi laptops, smart home, etc.). HyperOS is optimized for the secondary display and unique features like the rear-screen selfie preview and infrared remote control (since the phone even includes an IR blaster)[46][47]. Meanwhile, the iPhone 17 Pro Max runs iOS 26, Apple’s latest OS, which emphasizes seamless user experience and privacy. Apple’s ecosystem integration means if you own a Mac, iPad, or Apple Watch, the iPhone meshes with them out-of-the-box for calls, messages, continuity features and more. This year’s iOS reportedly adds new AI-powered features too, but Apple tends to implement them more subtly (e.g. improved on-device Siri, better autocorrect, etc., rather than marketing them as standalone AI apps).
One big new addition in iPhone 17 series is USB-C connectivity, a shift Apple made by 2025. Like Xiaomi, the iPhone now has a USB Type-C 3.2 port[48], finally embracing the universal standard and making it easier to share chargers and accessories between the two platforms. Both phones support advanced connectivity: Wi-Fi 7, dual-frequency GPS, NFC for payments, and of course comprehensive 5G. Apple holds an edge in including mmWave 5G support (important in the U.S.), whereas Xiaomi sticks to sub-6 GHz 5G and typically includes extras like an IR blaster and possibly dual SIM slots (Apple in many regions has gone eSIM-only)[49][50]. Each device is loaded with sensors and capabilities (UWB support on both, for precise device-to-device interactions[51]), reflecting their no-compromise flagship status.
In everyday use, both the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and iPhone 17 Pro Max feel lightning-fast and fluid. Animations on the 120 Hz displays are buttery smooth. Xiaomi’s HyperOS offers more customization out of the box, while iOS offers polish and simplicity. Power users might lean towards Xiaomi for features like split-screen multitasking, granular file management, or sideloading apps – things iOS still locks down. On the other hand, the iPhone’s performance is remarkably consistent and optimized across all apps (many developers target iOS for its high-end user base). Importantly, Apple’s efficiency means the A19 Pro can sustain high performance without throttling as much, which is part of how it keeps battery drain low under load. Xiaomi’s Snapdragon chip is extremely powerful, but historically Android phones can heat up and throttle faster in prolonged heavy tasks (gaming, 4K video editing, etc.), which may partially explain why the 17 Pro Max didn’t pull far ahead in that battery test[52] (it might be burning more energy to drive its performance).
In summary, Xiaomi delivers sheer hardware muscle and Android flexibility, whereas Apple leverages tight integration and optimization. For a buyer, both approaches have merit: Xiaomi gives you more freedom and features to tinker with, Apple gives you a reliably efficient and integrated experience. It’s a classic case of specs vs synergy – and the competition is pushing both to new heights.
Cameras: Triple 50 MP Leica Optics vs Triple 48 MP Apple Cameras
Both the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and iPhone 17 Pro Max are imaging juggernauts, sporting triple-lens camera systems that would have been unthinkable a few years ago. Yet the two companies take slightly different routes in their camera philosophies. Xiaomi partnered with Leica for its camera system, endowing the 17 Pro Max with a Leica-tuned imaging pipeline and color science[53]. All three rear cameras on the Xiaomi boast 50 MP sensors – a true trifecta of high resolution. The primary camera uses a large 1/1.28-inch sensor (with f/1.7 aperture and OIS)[54], similar in physical size to Apple’s main sensor. This big sensor, combined with Leica’s expertise, aims to capture crisp images with that classic Leica color processing and depth.
Where Xiaomi really pushes boundaries is the periscope telephoto lens. The 17 Pro Max’s zoom camera is 50 MP with up to 5× optical zoom and a relatively large 1/2.0-inch sensor[55]. In plain terms, Xiaomi gives you a farther native zoom range (5×) than Apple does, and with a bigger zoom sensor that should retain more detail at distance[56]. This telephoto lens can even double as a pseudo-macro camera; Xiaomi says it can focus at 30 cm, creating dramatic background compression for close-ups[57]. The ultrawide on Xiaomi is also 50 MP (120° field of view)[58], though interestingly it lacks autofocus, meaning Xiaomi chose to prioritize resolution over macro capability on the ultrawide. For selfies, Xiaomi didn’t skimp: a 50 MP front camera means even selfies are super detailed[59]. And thanks to that rear display, you can use the superior rear cameras for selfies or video blogs, previewing yourself on the back screen – a clever trick for content creators.
Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max, on the other hand, follows a more balanced approach with its triple 48 MP rear cameras[60]. All three (wide, telephoto, ultrawide) are 48 MP, an upgrade from the mixed 12 MP/48 MP setup just a couple years back. The primary sensor is also around 1/1.28-inch at f/1.8, but Apple employs its signature sensor-shift stabilization (moving the sensor itself) instead of just optical lens stabilization[61]. This gives the iPhone incredibly stable shots and video, reducing hand shake – an area where Apple has long excelled for videography. Apple’s telephoto lens tops out at 4× optical zoom (48 MP, f/2.8)[62], which sounds lower than Xiaomi’s 5×, but Apple uses clever cropping techniques to achieve up to 8× “optical-quality” zoom with minimal loss[63]. The tele sensor is smaller (1/2.55-inch), but Apple compensates with computation, and it also leverages the high-res sensors to allow up to 40× digital zoom if you really need to pinch in[64]. The ultrawide camera on the iPhone is 48 MP with a 120° field of view and does have autofocus, so Apple actually uses its ultrawide for macro shots (able to focus as close as 2 cm) instead of adding a dedicated macro lens[65]. For video, the iPhone remains king: it can do up to 4K at 120 fps slow-motion, with full support for 10‑bit HDR, Dolby Vision, ProRes, and even a new Apple Log format for professional color grading[66]. Xiaomi’s video capabilities are also top-tier – it supports up to 8K/30 fps recording (also with Dolby Vision HDR)[67] – which means it prioritizes resolution over frame rate, whereas Apple prioritizes frame rate and pro codecs. Both approaches have their audience, but Apple’s consistency in video (especially with that stabilization) is often lauded by content creators.
In terms of real-world results, both cameras are likely outstanding for photos and videos. Xiaomi’s images will have that Leica flair – possibly more contrast or filmic colors in Leica Vibrant or Authentic modes as seen in past Xiaomi-Leica collabs – and an abundance of detail thanks to high pixel counts. The iPhone’s photos will benefit from Apple’s smart HDR and computational photography; Apple tends to deliver very balanced, true-to-life shots with excellent dynamic range. Low-light performance should be interesting to compare: both have large main sensors, though Apple’s Night mode algorithms are famously effective, while Xiaomi’s big battery might let it run night mode shots with less worry about power. One advantage on the iPhone side is the dedicated Camera Control button Apple added this generation, giving users a physical key to quickly launch or tweak the camera[68]. Xiaomi doesn’t have a physical shutter button, but it cleverly lets the rear display act as a virtual shutter or control for the camera app[69].
Ultimately, each phone offers a pro-grade camera experience. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max provides an enthusiast’s playground – higher zoom, higher resolutions, Leica styles, 8K video – inviting you to experiment and capture from new angles (and even use the rear screen for unique shots). The iPhone 17 Pro Max focuses on delivering consistently excellent results with minimal fuss – you can trust that the iPhone will get the shot in almost any scenario, aided by Apple’s refined image processing and ecosystem of great third-party camera apps. As one Smartprix reviewer summed up, the iPhone offers “slightly better video stabilization along with the best camera system on an iPhone” so far[70], whereas the Xiaomi pushes the envelope with hardware like the 1-inch sensor and periscope zoom, arguably one of the most advanced camera setups on any smartphone in 2025.
Market Impact and Conclusion
This ultimate flagship face-off underscores how intense the Apple vs Android rivalry has become in 2025. Xiaomi clearly designed the 17 Pro Max to be a “iPhone killer”, stacking it with bigger numbers in almost every spec and pricing it aggressively relative to Apple. With features like a second display, 100W charging, and that 7,500 mAh battery, Xiaomi is targeting tech enthusiasts who crave cutting-edge features (and a good deal). The company even aligned its product launch to go head-to-head: the Xiaomi 17 series was announced just weeks after Apple’s iPhone 17 release, and by naming it “17” Xiaomi invites direct comparisons[71]. In markets like China and India, Xiaomi’s strategy could peel away some high-end users who might otherwise consider an iPhone, by offering more gadget for the money.
Apple, however, still holds formidable advantages. The brand ecosystem loyalty is strong – many iPhone users won’t easily switch due to iOS integration with their other devices. Apple’s focus on user experience, privacy, and long-term software support (iPhones often get 5+ years of updates) appeals to a broad audience. And as we saw, Apple’s efficiency-first approach can nullify some of Xiaomi’s brute-force hardware gains. The iPhone 17 Pro Max’s near draw in battery life and its superb camera performance show that Apple remains highly competitive where it counts, even if its spec sheet looks modest next to Xiaomi’s. Moreover, Apple’s distribution is global – the iPhone 17 Pro Max is available in major markets worldwide (it’s already on sale in India, US, Europe, etc.)[72], whereas Xiaomi’s 17 Pro Max might be limited to China (with possible later release in India and select regions)[73]. Availability could be a deciding factor; many Western consumers simply can’t easily buy a Xiaomi flagship through official channels, whereas the iPhone is everywhere.
From an industry perspective, this matchup is exciting because it pushes innovation. Xiaomi’s bold moves (like the 7,000+ mAh batteries across the 17 series[74] and fancy secondary displays) could inspire other Android makers – and even pressure Apple over time to adopt features once considered outlandish. Apple’s relentless optimization and ecosystem strength, on the other hand, set a high bar that Android OEMs strive to reach in user satisfaction. Consumers stand to win from this competition: longer battery life, faster charging, better cameras, and more choice at the high end. As one tech commentator noted about Xiaomi’s flagship, “the new 17 Pro Max sets a high bar for what we can expect to see in flagship smartphone designs, without compromising functionality and classy appeal.”[75] Apple will surely take note.
In conclusion, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs iPhone 17 Pro Max battle in 2025 is a dead heat in some areas (battery endurance, display size), a win for Xiaomi in others (charging speed, price-to-specs ratio, innovative extras), and a win for Apple in still others (software polish, global availability, arguably video quality). The fact that a $900-ish Xiaomi can stand toe-to-toe with a $1200+ iPhone shows how far the smartphone market has come – and how competitive it now is at the ultra-premium tier. For consumers deciding between these two, it may boil down to ecosystem and personal priorities: do you value Xiaomi’s ambitious hardware and Android openness, or Apple’s refined experience and integration? Either way, it’s impressive that a 7,500 mAh Android flagship can exist at all in such a sleek form, and even more impressive that Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro Max can nearly match its marathon battery life. This rivalry is heating up, and ultimately, having two “ultimate flagships” pushing each other means tech enthusiasts can look forward to even more groundbreaking features in the near future[76]. The flagship phone war of 2025 is well underway – and for now, neither side is backing down.
Sources: Recent tech reviews and comparisons from Gizmochina[77][78], Smartprix[79][80], NotebookCheck[81][82], and PhoneArena[83] (October 2025).
References
1. www.gizmochina.com, 2. www.notebookcheck.net, 3. www.notebookcheck.net, 4. www.smartprix.com, 5. www.smartprix.com, 6. www.gizmochina.com, 7. www.notebookcheck.net, 8. www.gizmochina.com, 9. www.facebook.com, 10. www.smartprix.com, 11. www.smartprix.com, 12. www.gizmochina.com, 13. www.notebookcheck.net, 14. www.notebookcheck.net, 15. www.notebookcheck.net, 16. www.notebookcheck.net, 17. www.notebookcheck.net, 18. www.gizmochina.com, 19. www.smartprix.com, 20. www.smartprix.com, 21. www.gizmochina.com, 22. www.smartprix.com, 23. www.smartprix.com, 24. www.smartprix.com, 25. www.smartprix.com, 26. www.smartprix.com, 27. www.gizmochina.com, 28. www.smartprix.com, 29. www.smartprix.com, 30. www.smartprix.com, 31. www.gizmochina.com, 32. www.gizmochina.com, 33. www.smartprix.com, 34. www.gizmochina.com, 35. www.smartprix.com, 36. www.smartprix.com, 37. www.smartprix.com, 38. www.facebook.com, 39. www.smartprix.com, 40. www.smartprix.com, 41. www.smartprix.com, 42. www.smartprix.com, 43. www.smartprix.com, 44. www.gizmochina.com, 45. www.smartprix.com, 46. www.smartprix.com, 47. www.smartprix.com, 48. www.smartprix.com, 49. www.smartprix.com, 50. www.smartprix.com, 51. www.gizmochina.com, 52. www.notebookcheck.net, 53. www.smartprix.com, 54. www.smartprix.com, 55. www.smartprix.com, 56. www.smartprix.com, 57. www.smartprix.com, 58. www.smartprix.com, 59. www.smartprix.com, 60. www.smartprix.com, 61. www.smartprix.com, 62. www.smartprix.com, 63. www.smartprix.com, 64. www.smartprix.com, 65. www.smartprix.com, 66. www.smartprix.com, 67. www.smartprix.com, 68. www.smartprix.com, 69. www.smartprix.com, 70. www.smartprix.com, 71. www.smartprix.com, 72. www.smartprix.com, 73. www.smartprix.com, 74. www.gizmochina.com, 75. www.smartprix.com, 76. www.smartprix.com, 77. www.gizmochina.com, 78. www.gizmochina.com, 79. www.smartprix.com, 80. www.smartprix.com, 81. www.notebookcheck.net, 82. www.notebookcheck.net, 83. www.facebook.com
